|






Usability Associates
38 Montpelier Circle
Rochester, NY 14618
585.442.0499
Copyright © 2001-2008 Usability Associates
| |
PRODUCT DESIGN AND USABILITY CONSORTIUM
RESEARCH
Previously completed research
 | (2007) Trend Analysis and Roadmapping. Consortium members
elected to have guest speakers from different companies discuss the
methods they use in their companies for determining and analyzing
technical, product, business, and environment trends.
Deliverable: Representatives from Johnson Controls, Hewlett
Packard, and Eastman Kodak presented contrasting ways they collect and
use trend data, and led informative discussions about those
methods. ABM Research, Ltd, gave a presentation on Semiotics,
which showed how some current product designs are evolutions of designs
from the past, including those of products and architecture.
|
 | (2006) New and emerging user interaction methods and technologies.
Most data was collected via in-depth Internet searching.
Deliverable: A document listing 61 methods/technologies coded
according to 12 interaction topic areas, the type of interface (cognitive,
physical, etc.), the stage of its development, and its uniqueness. Each
method is linked to its description and reference. Most have an accompanying
photo.
|
 | (2005) Global design and usability collaboration. A majority of
consortium members were interviewed to discover their experiences with
offshore partners. Interviews covered both the process and the outcomes from
15 cases of collaboration with groups in Europe and Asia. |
Deliverables: (1) A lessons learned document giving guidelines for
effective collaboration and (2) A PowerPoint description of the survey
including fishbone diagrams of outcomes showing financial losses/savings and
showing effects on other company assets.
 | (2004) Quantitative methods for measuring usability and emotional
response to products. Surveys of literature, internet, and professional
colleagues was done to collect data. |
Deliverable: A spreadsheet listing 39 methods coded according to
purpose, application domain, type of measurement, type of outcome, industry
usage, and effort required to get results. Each method is linked to a series
of bullets that succinctly describe it. Complete references are also
provided for each method.
Candidates for future research
A) Within Membership: Information can be
collected from member companies and condensed into a report protecting company
anonymity.
- Compile qualitative PDU information such as organizational relationships,
organizational practices, and future vision
- Benchmark specific quantitative PDU data (e.g., headcount ratios,
financial ratios, salary survey) that are comparable across companies
- Benchmark the process of establishing and applying a common look and feel
across products
- Conduct third-party survey/interviews of upper-level management's
perceptions about product design and usability in your respective companies
B) External to Membership: Relevant topics can be researched in any of
several forms including company surveys, surveys of ongoing university research,
literature searches, guidelines, regulatory searches, state-of-the-art
technology assessments, and other special studies.
- Globalization - guidelines for product localization in selected countries
- Eye tracking - state-of-the-art research and application
- Transcription analysis techniques - methods for analyzing transcriptions
of interviews, focus groups, usability tests
- Remote usability testing -pros and cons of tools; examples of
applications; comparison of results with traditional testing
- Repeatability of usability testing results - how to make them robust
- New software being developed for computer aided design
- New methods being developed for producing prototypes and models
- Identification and contact information of U.S. and foreign usability labs
for hire
- User experience model - what is it, e.g., a generic model representing it
- Speech recognition - what is ready for application, what is state of the
art, where is it going.
- Universal Design guidelines and technologies – Need to specify populations
(e.g., big, small, elderly, expectant mothers, children, disabled), product
type, and environments (home, work, transportation). Pete indicates the
following:
- We are shooting for a broad description of Universal Design including the
physical and cognitive capabilities and requirements for
passengers/attendants, both today and in the future. We need full definition
of our user population (age, culture, archetypes, trends, etc.), evaluation
strategies and tools, and identification of targeted expertise.
- Continue 2005 research on global co-development by interviewing
non-members and merging the data with previously collected data. This would
increase the data sample size.
- Use of text, diagrams, illustrations, and photos etc. to compose effective
written instructions
- Electronic instructions – guidelines and examples for leveraging software
to create effective instructional material
- Trend roadmapping or trend spotting processes (see Visions-Sept p19
including JCI process on p21)
- Case studies of collaboration between Human Factors and industrial Design
and/or Graphic Design. Survey managers about significant cases of
collaboration to determine factors that contributed to successes and failures.
Can be a mix of consortium and external companies.
- Identify ideation/creativity techniques including pros/cons and when they
apply
- Tools and methodology to support strategy execution
- How companies harvest existing internal data (e.g., customer hot lines,
product registrations, service reports) to discover user problems and concerns
- Identification of online newsgroups, forums, RSS feeds, and blogs related
to product development, product design, and usability. Will include a
description of each one.
- Lessons learned for methods used to create and sustain a culture of
innovation. Literature review of case studies and/or interviews with managers
at selected companies within and outside the consortium. Will exclude general
"how to" books and articles.
- Open innovation - a survey of the flow of new product design and usability
ideas across corporate borders. Interviews will be conducted to identify
patent exchanges, licensing, etc. and the actual or perceived benefits and
risks associated with each. (This may be difficult to do because of
proprietary considerations).
Back to Top
|